Re: Helix GNOME, report of compilation, 2nd edition
Quoting Peter Teichman <peter@helixcode.com>:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, hadess@writeme.com wrote:
> > I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2
> packages won't
> > be included:
>
> > - gtk-themes, because of the Stone engine being already compiled for
> x86 in the
> > source package.
>
> Sigh, I thought I had fixed that. I'll have a fixed source package up
> asap, and will let you know when it is done.
Good
>
> > - Abiword, I really couldn't get it to compile.
>
> Abiword's build process is extremely nasty. It took a lot of work to
> build here, and I'm not too surprised that you are having problems. Is
> there anything I can help with?
Hum, I can't think of anything on top of my head. I just tried to recompile it
every way I could think of. I will need to take a look at the debian/* files,
and see if I can fix anything.
>
> > - gnumeric and gnome-iconedit use liboaf _at compile-time_, should be
> added to
> > the building pre-requisites
>
> This should not be the case. We don't use oaf as part of Helix GNOME,
> and our gnumeric and gnome-iconedit binaries are not linked against
> it.
>
> You may want to remove liboaf-dev before building gnumeric and
> gnome-iconedit. It is possible that they are enabling oaf support when
> they find that package installed.
Well, they just need it at compile-time. It statically links to it. The
dependencies are the same as on my work computer (x86).
>
> > - liboaf-dev and libgnome-dev both contain
> /usr/share/idl/gnome-factory.idl, the
> > problem is likely to be in the upstream release
>
> Yes, the problem is upstream. I'm not quite sure how to resolve it at
> the moment.
You just got dpkg giving errors, that's all. The files seem to be the same ones.
Maybe just removing it from liboaf-dev file listing, and wait till it is fixed
upstream.
>
> > - glade-gnome is missing Priority and Section fields
>
> Perhaps you could help with this. apt-get source glade, then look at
> the control file. The fields are definitely there, though lintian
> complains about the final deb. I haven't figured out how to fix it.
Same thing as for Abiword
>
> Peter
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: