Re: Storm Linux 2000
No no no...
Storm Linux is an -excellent- product from all I've seen of it. They
are a very intelligent, talented group of people, and their hearts are
in the right places - most of its best parts will feed back into
debian, and you can upgrade most of it from debian mirror sites.
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:42:28AM -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> From all accounts that I've found, I've been informed that Storm
> Linux 2000 is based off an outdated version of Debian (possibly hamm)... I'm
> not sure if they even bothered to upgrade the packages themselves or not...
> I've gone and downloaded their ISO from their site but haven't yet burned
> it to a CD as I really don't have a machine I can kill in order to test it
> out...
>
> Respectfully,
> Jeremy T. Bouse
> UnderGrid Network Services, LLC
>
> Björn Johansson was said to been seen saying:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What do you think about Storm Linux 2000? I've been reading a little about
> > it, and according to them, it's more easy to install than Debian although
> > it's been built on Debian. Is Storm Linux 2000 a threat to Debian or is it
> > a good thing that Debian is the source for new Linux distributions?
> >
> > http://www.stormlinux.com
> >
>
> --
> ,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,
> | Jeremy T. Bouse - UnderGrid Network Services, LLC - www.UnderGrid.net |
> | All messages from this address should be atleast PGP/GPG signed |
> | Public PGP/GPG key available through http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net |
> | If received unsigned (without requesting as such) DO NOT trust it! |
> | Jeremy.Bouse@UnderGrid.net - NIC Whois: JB5713 - undrgrid@UnderGrid.net |
> `-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: