[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: netscape?



On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 03:12:06PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 06:30:01AM -0500, Jeramy B Smith wrote:
> > > why is that LinuxPPC has the latest netscape communicator
> > > up and running but Debian does not?
> > >
> > >  Sergio
> > 
> > I thought it was because Netscape 3,4 aren't totally free. Maybe 5 will make
> > the Debian requirements.
> 
> Debian has several different distributions.  main, contrib, non-free
> and non-US.  The main distribution only allows Free Software as
> defined by the Debian Free Software Guidelines
> (http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines).  contrib and
> non-free are "not part of the Debian system, although it has been
> configured for use with Debian."  Seems a pretty thin distinction to
> me, but at least the line is there.
> 
> Anyhow, stuff like Netscape, which is just free beer, goes into
> non-free.  Mozilla's (Netscape 5) NPL license allows it to go into the
> main distribution.  They're both currently in the Powerpc distribution
> under non-free/web and main/web respectively.  Mozilla is at M8
> (current milestone), Netscape is at 4.6 (looks like pieces of 4.61 are
> there).  I don't know what the current version of Netscape is, but
> something tells me it doesn't make a whole lot of difference.

PowerPC 4.61 is much better than 4.6.  It's not packaged yet.  I spoke
to the maintainer twenty seconds ago, and he's looking for it now.

> I wonder, does MySQL's "Its free unless you're using Windows" license
> fail the "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"?

Yep.


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|        SCS Class of 2002       |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __    Carnegie Mellon University   |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |       dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu      |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/


Reply to: