Re: lam .deb in devel, perl wizard needed
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> pardon me, but is there not a standard that must be met by all packages?
> As it is lam-6.1-2.deb is far away from this standard. It is just a
> collection of useless files, since the library and the binaries are not
> there. And it will take quite long till it 's been fully ported since
> there is a lot of i386-specific assembly code in there. Personally I
> prefer not to have such a misguiding package at all..
It shouldn't be there. I don't even see one - is it new in the past
few days? LAM is a very processor-specific package; MPI on powerpc is
flaky at the very best.
> PS. Is there anyone that is proficient with perl? Drop me a mail please.
What's the problem?
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| CMU, CS class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Part-Time Systems Programmer |
| dan@debian.org | | drow@cs.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: