[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#976402: Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.txt




On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:48 PM Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote:


Putting aside the use of the alternatives system, why is a virtual
package wanted?  When would it be useful to be able to declare a
dependency and have it satisfied by one of these implementations?


As an example, a future rev of an integrated todo.txt-gtd[1] would depend on that virtual package.

[1]:  https://github.com/davesteele/todo.txt-gtd


Reply to: