Hi, On 14-12-2020 22:43, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 2020 at 07:49PM +01, Bill Allombert wrote:'not fail' here means that the script terminates with return code 0.This is how I would read it too. Would a patch to add "(i.e. exit with return code 0)" resolve the original submitter's concerns?
Though I'm still not convinced it's a sensible requirement, that clarification would resolve my main concern (i.e. having to fix init scripts to work with an absent defaults file). By the way, there's an identical requirement a few paragraphs before, so it might be good to insert the same clarification there as well.
Cheers, Oxan