[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#976402: Proposed official virtual packages - todo and todo.txt



Hello,

On Mon 14 Dec 2020 at 05:29PM -05, David Steele wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:48 PM Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Putting aside the use of the alternatives system, why is a virtual
>> package wanted?  When would it be useful to be able to declare a
>> dependency and have it satisfied by one of these implementations?
>>
>>
> As an example, a future rev of an integrated todo.txt-gtd[1] would depend
> on that virtual package.

Why would that be useful?

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: