debian-policy Jan 2020 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Aurélien COUDERC

Bug#948615: debian-policy: Broken link to the list of virtual package names Jan 10

Bill Allombert

Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 23

Colin Watson

Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05

Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Bug#945906 marked as pending in developers-reference Jan 09
Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 948275 ... Jan 20
Bug#949390: marked as done (Newly created package usernames should begin with an underscore) Jan 20
Bug#949007: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in example) Jan 20
Bug#941198: marked as done (initscripts: packages should ship systemd units) Jan 20
Bug#932704: marked as done (debian-policy: Don't force sysvinit compatibility if e.g. alternate init required) Jan 21
Processed: Re: Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 20
Processed: Re: Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example Jan 16
Bug#945906: marked as done (dev-ref 4.6.4.1: text about unstable during the freeze might mislead) Jan 09
Bug#948115: marked as done (Revise init script Policy based on GR result) Jan 20
Processed: fixed 932704 in 4.5.0.0 Jan 21
Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 949390 Jan 20

Debian FTP Masters

Processing of developers-reference_11.0.8_source.changes Jan 09
Processing of debian-policy_4.5.0.0_source.changes Jan 20
debian-policy_4.5.0.0_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 20
developers-reference_11.0.8_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 09

Drew Parsons

Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build section Jan 20

Guillem Jover

Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 30
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 26

Harald Dunkel

Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant? Jan 06
Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant? Jan 07

Jonathan Nieder

Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules Jan 16
Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules Jan 16
Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example Jan 16

Josh Triplett

RFC: No new Essential packages? Jan 30

Lennart Poettering

Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 14

Lorenzo Puliti

Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 05

Matthew Vernon

Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 02

Mattia Rizzolo

Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build section Jan 21

Michael Biebl

Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 14
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 23

Nicholas D Steeves

Bug#905453: debian-policy: Policy does not include a section on NEWS.Debian files Jan 27

Niels Thykier

Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example Jan 15
Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules Jan 16
Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules Jan 15
Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules Jan 16

Philipp Kern

Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05
Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build section Jan 20
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 04
Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build section Jan 21
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 14
Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 04
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05

Russ Allbery

Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 04
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 04
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 04
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 23
Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant? Jan 06
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05
Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages Jan 03
Re: Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 04
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 04
Bug#949390: Newly created package usernames should begin with an underscore Jan 20
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 04
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 03
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 05
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 04
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 04
Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant? Jan 07
Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example Jan 16

Sam Hartman

Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 04
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 03
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 04
Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build section Jan 21
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 24
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 04
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 04
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 24

Samuel Thibault

Bug#949258: debian-policy: Support negated architecture specifications in debian/control Architecture field Jan 19

Sean Whitton

Bug#949390: Newly created package usernames should begin with an underscore Jan 20
Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result Jan 20
Bug#905453: debian-policy: Policy does not include a section on NEWS.Debian files Jan 29
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 03
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 24
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 25
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 29
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 20
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 03
Re: Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 03
Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements Jan 25

Simon McVittie

Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 05
Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy Jan 03
Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the package" seems too strong Jan 23
Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant? Jan 06
Re: Guidance on solving the username namespacing problem Jan 04

Stephanie Guss

Re: Please help me Jan 13

The last update was on 21:00 GMT Thu Jan 30. There are 90 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc