Bug#698030: debian-policy: document micro binary packages (udebs).
Bill Allombert wrote:
> In that case there could be a udeb subpolicy document maintained by the
> d-i team that policy would refer to.
Yeah, that would be fine with me, even though I still don't see the
point.
Is there a git subpolicy describing how git is packaged? A gnome
subpolicy about gnome packaging?
The only difference for udebs is that the work is spread over packages
throughout the system. They are still maintained by the d-i team.
Anyway, I'm not too concerned about that question. What I am
concerned about is that the next release of policy should not include
wording that requires people to make a decision between ignoring what
policy says and filing RC bugs about, e.g., udebs not including
changelogs.
Reply to: