Bug#698030: debian-policy: document micro binary packages (udebs).
Charles Plessy wrote:
> If you think that it is necessary to obtain the agreement of the d-i team to
> mention the udebs in #697433, please go ahead, but on my side, I do not think
> that there is a problem here.
I guess I'm completely failing to communicate.
udebs are already documented very clearly. There is _no point_ in
policy replicating that. Policy is meant to help multiple people
cooperate to make the Debian system work in a consistent way ---
adding some docs about udebs would not help that at all.
All I said is that the text in #697433 seems to (unintentionally, I
hope) imply that packages with "Package-type: udeb" are an example of
the packages that policy defines. I suggested a way to fix that ---
just link to the d-i docs. I see no downside to that.
Yet I'm getting a lot of resistance to the suggestion. Why? What am