Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:45:39AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Russ Allbery wrote: > > > 3. Neither the name of the Debian Project nor the names of its > > > contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from > > > this software without specific prior written permission. > > Clause 3 is the advertising clause, isn't it? The license statement explicitly > > says without that clause. So, the license in debconf's own copyright > > file would seem most appropriate. > > Nope. Clause 3 of the original BSD license is the advertising clause: > > | All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > | must display the following acknowledgement: “This product includes > | software developed by the University of California, Berkeley and its > | contributors.” Ah right. Anyway, I'd prefer the debconf version of the license, especially since clause 3 is fairly no-op in the context of a specification. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature