Processed (with 2 errors): Set up Policy bug categories and record current triage
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> # Setting up user categories for Policy bug triage and to help in the
> # process. This uses the same classification scheme as mine adjusted by
> # Manoj and previously discussed on the mailing list, with a few
> # modifications so that the existing bug system tags can be used where
> # possible:
> #
> # * Use patch for the wording tag so that a traditional view shows those.
> # * Use pending for accepted, since they mean the same thing.
> # * Use wontfix for rejected, likewise.
> # * Sort by severity before issue-status instead of afterwards.
> # * Don't sort by classification; issue-status supersedes it.
> #
> # We still sort by status first, which means that accepted and rejected
> # bugs fall out of the main section into the bottom section.
> user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-policy@packages.debian.org (was rra@debian.org).
> usercategory issue-type [hidden]
> * Issue Type [tag=]
> + Normative [normative]
> + Informative [informative]
> + Packaging [packaging]
> + Unclassified []
Added usercategory issue-type.
> usercategory issue-status [hidden]
> * Issue Status [tag=]
> + Issue Raised [issue]
> + Under Discussion [discussion]
> + Opinion Solicited [opinion]
> + Change Proposed [proposal]
> + Wording Proposed [patch]
> + Wording Seconded [seconded]
> + Wording Accepted [pending]
> + Rejected [wontfix]
> + Unknown []
Added usercategory issue-status.
> usercategory normal
> * status
> * issue-type
> * severity
> * issue-status
Added usercategory normal.
> usercategory old
> * status
> * severity
> * classification
Added usercategory old.
> package debian-policy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy
> usertag 452393 informative issue
Bug#452393: [PROPOSAL] clarify overstep between "required" and "important" priorities
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue informative.
> retitle 452393 Clarify difference between required and important priorities
Bug#452393: [PROPOSAL] clarify overstep between "required" and "important" priorities
Changed Bug title to `Clarify difference between required and important priorities' from `[PROPOSAL] clarify overstep between "required" and "important" priorities'.
> tag 452393 -patch
Bug#452393: Clarify difference between required and important priorities
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> usertag 163666 informative discussion
Bug#163666: debian-policy: Unclear result with [arch] and |
Usertags were: informative discussion.
Usertags are now: informative discussion.
> retitle 163666 Interpretation of [arch] is unclear with alternatives (|)
Bug#163666: debian-policy: Unclear result with [arch] and |
Changed Bug title to `Interpretation of [arch] is unclear with alternatives (|)' from `debian-policy: Unclear result with [arch] and |'.
> usertag 186102 informative discussion
Bug#186102: version numbering for date-releases is flawed
Usertags were: informative proposal.
Usertags are now: informative proposal discussion.
> retitle 186102 Suggest better date-based version numbers
Bug#186102: version numbering for date-releases is flawed
Changed Bug title to `Suggest better date-based version numbers' from `version numbering for date-releases is flawed'.
> usertag 175202 informative proposal
Bug#175202: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples
Usertags were: informative proposal.
Usertags are now: informative proposal.
> retitle 175202 Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples
Bug#175202: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples
Changed Bug title to `Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples' from `debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Clarify Perl package naming convention with more examples'.
> usertag 218897 informative proposal
Bug#218897: debian-policy: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package
Usertags were: informative discussion.
Usertags are now: informative proposal discussion.
> retitle 218897 Explicitly say dpkg-divert --local is a bad idea in packages
Bug#218897: debian-policy: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package
Changed Bug title to `Explicitly say dpkg-divert --local is a bad idea in packages' from `debian-policy: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package'.
> usertag 328951 informative proposal
Bug#328951: Clarification for difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep (Section 7.6)
Usertags were: informative proposal.
Usertags are now: informative proposal.
> retitle 328951 Clarify relationship between targets and Build-Depends{,-Indep}
Bug#328951: Clarification for difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep (Section 7.6)
Changed Bug title to `Clarify relationship between targets and Build-Depends{,-Indep}' from `Clarification for difference between Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep (Section 7.6)'.
> severity 328951 wishlist
Bug#328951: Clarify relationship between targets and Build-Depends{,-Indep}
Severity set to `wishlist' from `minor'
> usertag 442134 informative proposal
Bug#442134: Inconsistency/typo: half-configured vs. failed-config
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative informative proposal.
> retitle 442134 Inconsistency: half-configured vs. failed-config
Bug#442134: Inconsistency/typo: half-configured vs. failed-config
Changed Bug title to `Inconsistency: half-configured vs. failed-config' from `Inconsistency/typo: half-configured vs. failed-config'.
> usertag 455602 informative
Bug#455602: debian-policy: Examples of dpkg frontends should mention apt now
Usertags were: issue informative.
Usertags are now: issue informative.
> usertag 422552 informative
Bug#422552: Minor typos and wording suggestions
Usertags were: informative discussion.
Usertags are now: informative discussion.
> usertag 89038 normative issue
Bug#89038: [PROPOSAL] The information in the update-mime manpage should be in policy
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 89038 [mime-policy] Include update-mime behavior
Bug#89038: [PROPOSAL] The information in the update-mime manpage should be in policy
Changed Bug title to `[mime-policy] Include update-mime behavior' from `[PROPOSAL] The information in the update-mime manpage should be in policy'.
> usertag 181123 normative issue
Bug#181123: regulate init script (mis)behaviour in corner cases
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 181123 Regulate init script behavior in unusual cases
Bug#181123: regulate init script (mis)behaviour in corner cases
Changed Bug title to `Regulate init script behavior in unusual cases' from `regulate init script (mis)behaviour in corner cases'.
> usertag 120418 normative issue
Bug#120418: [PROPOSAL] CPU extension code
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 120418 Policy for code using CPU extensions
Bug#120418: [PROPOSAL] CPU extension code
Changed Bug title to `Policy for code using CPU extensions' from `[PROPOSAL] CPU extension code'.
> usertag 122038 normative issue
Bug#122038: Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 122038 Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented
Bug#122038: Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented
Changed Bug title to `Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented' from `Use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented'.
> usertag 161912 normative issue
Bug#161912: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 161912 Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation
Bug#161912: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation
Changed Bug title to `Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation' from `[PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation'.
> usertag 186700 normative issue
Bug#186700: debian-policy: Ch. 4: Not clear what to do with empty debian revision
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 186700 Sorting and meaning of an empty Debian revision is unclear
Bug#186700: debian-policy: Ch. 4: Not clear what to do with empty debian revision
Changed Bug title to `Sorting and meaning of an empty Debian revision is unclear' from `debian-policy: Ch. 4: Not clear what to do with empty debian revision'.
> severity 186700 minor
Bug#186700: Sorting and meaning of an empty Debian revision is unclear
Severity set to `minor' from `wishlist'
> usertag 192571 normative issue
Bug#192571: debian-policy: Size limit for doc packages
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 192571 Size limit for doc packages
Bug#192571: debian-policy: Size limit for doc packages
Changed Bug title to `Size limit for doc packages' from `debian-policy: Size limit for doc packages'.
> usertag 215549 normative issue
Bug#215549: dh-make: postinst.ex does not handle argument "reconfigure"
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 215549 reconfigure argument to postinst
Bug#215549: dh-make: postinst.ex does not handle argument "reconfigure"
Changed Bug title to `reconfigure argument to postinst' from `dh-make: postinst.ex does not handle argument "reconfigure"'.
> usertag 263448 normative issue
Bug#263448: msttcorefonts: separate directory for non-free fonts, so apps can discourage their use in new documents
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 263448 Separate font directory for non-free fonts
Bug#263448: msttcorefonts: separate directory for non-free fonts, so apps can discourage their use in new documents
Changed Bug title to `Separate font directory for non-free fonts' from `msttcorefonts: separate directory for non-free fonts, so apps can discourage their use in new documents'.
> usertag 276160 normative issue
Bug#276160: Path variables in init.d scripts
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> usertag 400322 normative issue
Bug#400322: Chapter 7.x: please specify more explicitly which fields can be restricted to archs
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 400322 Specify which dependency fields may be restricted by arch
Bug#400322: Chapter 7.x: please specify more explicitly which fields can be restricted to archs
Changed Bug title to `Specify which dependency fields may be restricted by arch' from `Chapter 7.x: please specify more explicitly which fields can be restricted to archs'.
> usertag 402721 normative issue
Bug#402721: debian-policy: WISHLIST Please make clear, that "conflicts" should only be used when really necessary
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 402721 State Conflicts must not be used unless necessary
Bug#402721: debian-policy: WISHLIST Please make clear, that "conflicts" should only be used when really necessary
Changed Bug title to `State Conflicts must not be used unless necessary' from `debian-policy: WISHLIST Please make clear, that "conflicts" should only be used when really necessary'.
> usertag 408500 normative issue
Bug#408500: debian-policy: Section 2.2.1: add package must be rebuilt from source
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 408500 Packages must be built from source
Bug#408500: debian-policy: Section 2.2.1: add package must be rebuilt from source
Changed Bug title to `Packages must be built from source' from `debian-policy: Section 2.2.1: add package must be rebuilt from source'.
> usertag 445203 normative issue
Bug#445203: debian-policy: 10.8. Log files: /etc/logrotate.d/<package> preferred
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 445203 Log files: /etc/logrotate.d/<package> preferred
Bug#445203: debian-policy: 10.8. Log files: /etc/logrotate.d/<package> preferred
Changed Bug title to `Log files: /etc/logrotate.d/<package> preferred' from `debian-policy: 10.8. Log files: /etc/logrotate.d/<package> preferred'.
> usertag 446712 normative issue
Bug#446712: debian-policy: document comments in debian/control
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 446712 Document comments are permitted in debian/control
Bug#446712: debian-policy: document comments in debian/control
Changed Bug title to `Document comments are permitted in debian/control' from `debian-policy: document comments in debian/control'.
> usertag 160827 normative discussion
Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 160827 Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field
Bug#160827: syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field
Changed Bug title to `Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field' from `syntax of the maintainer name in the Maintainer: field'.
> usertag 188731 normative discussion
Bug#188731: debian-policy: "strip --strip-unneeded" is insufficient
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 188731 Also strip .comment and .note sections
Bug#188731: debian-policy: "strip --strip-unneeded" is insufficient
Changed Bug title to `Also strip .comment and .note sections' from `debian-policy: "strip --strip-unneeded" is insufficient'.
> usertag 212814 normative discussion
Bug#212814: please clarify 3.4: description of a package
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 212814 Clarify relationship between long and short description
Bug#212814: please clarify 3.4: description of a package
Changed Bug title to `Clarify relationship between long and short description' from `please clarify 3.4: description of a package'.
> usertag 228692 normative discussion
Bug#228692: Section 9.2.2 UID and GID classes
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 228692 User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Bug#228692: Section 9.2.2 UID and GID classes
Changed Bug title to `User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts' from `Section 9.2.2 UID and GID classes'.
> usertag 232448 normative discussion
Bug#232448: debian-policy: Ada Library Information files must be read-only
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 232448 Ada Library Information files must be read-only
Bug#232448: debian-policy: Ada Library Information files must be read-only
Changed Bug title to `Ada Library Information files must be read-only' from `debian-policy: Ada Library Information files must be read-only'.
> usertag 248809 normative discussion
Bug#248809: policy needed for user names Debian name space
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 248809 Debian user namespace for package-created users
Bug#248809: policy needed for user names Debian name space
Changed Bug title to `Debian user namespace for package-created users' from `policy needed for user names Debian name space'.
> usertag 267142 normative discussion
Bug#267142: [DISCUSS] Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal discussion.
> retitle 267142 Specify allowable behavior for /bin/sh shell builtins
Bug#267142: [DISCUSS] Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent
Changed Bug title to `Specify allowable behavior for /bin/sh shell builtins' from `[DISCUSS] Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent'.
> usertag 291148 normative discussion
Bug#291148: [PROPOSAL] Add a 'status' option in init.d scripts
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 291148 status action for init.d scripts
Bug#291148: [PROPOSAL] Add a 'status' option in init.d scripts
Changed Bug title to `status action for init.d scripts' from `[PROPOSAL] Add a 'status' option in init.d scripts'.
> usertag 291177 normative discussion
Bug#291177: [PROPOSAL] Policy for user/groups creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 291177 User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Bug#291177: [PROPOSAL] Policy for user/groups creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Changed Bug title to `User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts' from `[PROPOSAL] Policy for user/groups creation/removal in package maintainer scripts'.
> merge 228692 291177
Bug#228692: User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Bug#291177: User/group creation/removal in package maintainer scripts
Merged 228692 291177.
> usertag 291631 normative discussion
Bug#291631: cmp/diff/etc. lack PT_GNU_STACK header
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 291631 Prohibit executable stacks (require PT_GNU_STACK header)
Bug#291631: cmp/diff/etc. lack PT_GNU_STACK header
Changed Bug title to `Prohibit executable stacks (require PT_GNU_STACK header)' from `cmp/diff/etc. lack PT_GNU_STACK header'.
> usertag 338219 normative discussion
Bug#338219: [Discussion] could section 8.1 mandate what library directories will be searched
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 338219 Mandate ldconfig search list or directories for which ldconfig should be called
Bug#338219: [Discussion] could section 8.1 mandate what library directories will be searched
Changed Bug title to `Mandate ldconfig search list or directories for which ldconfig should be called' from `[Discussion] could section 8.1 mandate what library directories will be searched'.
> usertag 345619 normative discussion
Bug#345619: debian-policy: 4.8. binary-{arch, indep} should fail with error code 2 -> must
Usertags were: normative dubious proposal.
Usertags are now: normative dubious proposal discussion.
> retitle 345619 build-arch and build-indep targets should be required
Bug#345619: debian-policy: 4.8. binary-{arch, indep} should fail with error code 2 -> must
Changed Bug title to `build-arch and build-indep targets should be required' from `debian-policy: 4.8. binary-{arch, indep} should fail with error code 2 -> must'.
> usertag 374029 normative discussion
Bug#374029: Fixing inconsisten and unusefull Build-Depends/Conflicts definition
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 374029 Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed
Bug#374029: Fixing inconsisten and unusefull Build-Depends/Conflicts definition
Changed Bug title to `Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed' from `Fixing inconsisten and unusefull Build-Depends/Conflicts definition'.
> usertag 375502 normative discussion
Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 375502 Clarify management and status of sub-policies
Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed
Changed Bug title to `Clarify management and status of sub-policies' from `debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed'.
> usertag 391240 normative discussion
Bug#391240: debian-policy: Please elaborate on cleaning up files outside the build dir
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 391240 Clean target should remove created files outside the build directory
Bug#391240: debian-policy: Please elaborate on cleaning up files outside the build dir
Changed Bug title to `Clean target should remove created files outside the build directory' from `debian-policy: Please elaborate on cleaning up files outside the build dir'.
> tags 391240 -patch
Bug#391240: Clean target should remove created files outside the build directory
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> usertag 391841 normative discussion
Bug#391841: debian-policy: Remove time-daemon
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 391841 Virtual package time-daemon underspecified
Bug#391841: debian-policy: Remove time-daemon
Changed Bug title to `Virtual package time-daemon underspecified' from `debian-policy: Remove time-daemon'.
> usertag 397939 normative discussion
Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 397939 clean rule behavior underspecified and inconsistent with common practice
Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target
Changed Bug title to `clean rule behavior underspecified and inconsistent with common practice' from `Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target'.
> usertag 399913 normative discussion
Bug#399913: (Re-)Add "editor" to virtual package list
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 399913 Re-add editor as a virtual package
Bug#399913: (Re-)Add "editor" to virtual package list
Changed Bug title to `Re-add editor as a virtual package' from `(Re-)Add "editor" to virtual package list'.
> usertag 400112 normative discussion
Bug#400112: [PROPOSAL] forbid source/binary package name conflicts
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 400112 Forbid building binary packages with the same name as another source package
Bug#400112: [PROPOSAL] forbid source/binary package name conflicts
Changed Bug title to `Forbid building binary packages with the same name as another source package' from `[PROPOSAL] forbid source/binary package name conflicts'.
> usertag 401452 normative discussion
Bug#401452: Please clarify the format of the maintainer address to use in Maintainer: and Uploader:
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 401452 Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field
Bug#401452: Please clarify the format of the maintainer address to use in Maintainer: and Uploader:
Changed Bug title to `Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field' from `Please clarify the format of the maintainer address to use in Maintainer: and Uploader:'.
> merge 160827 401452
Bug#160827: Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field
Bug#401452: Standardize syntax of the name in the Maintainer control field
Merged 160827 401452.
> usertag 403649 normative discussion
Bug#403649: debian-policy: Should clarify package availability in "postrm remove"
Usertags were: normative discussion dpkg.
Usertags are now: normative discussion dpkg.
> retitle 403649 Clarify Depends reliability during postrm remove
Bug#403649: debian-policy: Should clarify package availability in "postrm remove"
Changed Bug title to `Clarify Depends reliability during postrm remove' from `debian-policy: Should clarify package availability in "postrm remove"'.
> usertag 412668 normative discussion
Bug#412668: debian-policy: extended 10.7 to other forms of configuration (e.g. symlinks)
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 412668 Extend configuration file protection to symlinks
Bug#412668: debian-policy: extended 10.7 to other forms of configuration (e.g. symlinks)
Changed Bug title to `Extend configuration file protection to symlinks' from `debian-policy: extended 10.7 to other forms of configuration (e.g. symlinks)'.
> usertag 413353 normative discussion
Bug#413353: debian-policy: New virtual package: dict-freedict
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 413353 New virtual package: dict-freedict
Bug#413353: debian-policy: New virtual package: dict-freedict
Changed Bug title to `New virtual package: dict-freedict' from `debian-policy: New virtual package: dict-freedict'.
> usertag 431109 normative discussion
Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 431109 Deprecate use of GPL/LGPL/GFDL symlinks
Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks
Changed Bug title to `Deprecate use of GPL/LGPL/GFDL symlinks' from `[PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks'.
> usertag 436419 normative discussion
Bug#436419: Mandatory -dbg packages for shared libraries
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> usertag 447231 normative discussion
Bug number 447231 belongs to package debian-policy,python-defaults, skipping.
> retitle 447231 Python sub-policy
Bug number 447231 belongs to package debian-policy,python-defaults, skipping.
> usertag 457364 normative discussion
Bug#457364: debian-policy: please reserve part of the package namespace for cross compilation
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue discussion.
> retitle 457364 Reserve package namespace for cross-compiled packages
Bug#457364: debian-policy: please reserve part of the package namespace for cross compilation
Changed Bug title to `Reserve package namespace for cross-compiled packages' from `debian-policy: please reserve part of the package namespace for cross compilation'.
> unmerge 99933
Bug#99933: [PENDING AMENDMENT 06/07/2001] Encourage use of UTF-8 in documentation and clarify encoding issues
Bug#143941: [PENDING] define a usable character set for description/maintainer name etc
Bug#208011: [PROPOSAL] UTF-8 encoding for debian/control
Disconnected #99933 from all other report(s).
> usertag 99933 normative proposal
Bug#99933: [PENDING AMENDMENT 06/07/2001] Encourage use of UTF-8 in documentation and clarify encoding issues
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative proposal discussion.
> retitle 99933 Encourage UTF-8 for documentation and clarify encoding issues
Bug#99933: [PENDING AMENDMENT 06/07/2001] Encourage use of UTF-8 in documentation and clarify encoding issues
Changed Bug title to `Encourage UTF-8 for documentation and clarify encoding issues' from `[PENDING AMENDMENT 06/07/2001] Encourage use of UTF-8 in documentation and clarify encoding issues'.
> usertag 104373 normative proposal
Bug#104373: [PROPOSAL] Subdirectory under /usr/lib/cgi-lib should be explicitly allowed
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 104373 Allow subdirectories under /usr/lib/cgi-bin
Bug#104373: [PROPOSAL] Subdirectory under /usr/lib/cgi-lib should be explicitly allowed
Changed Bug title to `Allow subdirectories under /usr/lib/cgi-bin' from `[PROPOSAL] Subdirectory under /usr/lib/cgi-lib should be explicitly allowed'.
> usertag 106073 normative proposal
Bug#106073: [PROPOSAL] separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 106073 Separate doc packages should not put docs in /usr/share/doc/package-doc
Bug#106073: [PROPOSAL] separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/
Changed Bug title to `Separate doc packages should not put docs in /usr/share/doc/package-doc' from `[PROPOSAL] separate doc packages should not be unpacked to /usr/share/doc/[package]-doc/'.
> usertag 143941 normative proposal
Bug#143941: [PENDING] define a usable character set for description/maintainer name etc
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 143941 Mandate UTF-8 for control files
Bug#143941: [PENDING] define a usable character set for description/maintainer name etc
Changed Bug title to `Mandate UTF-8 for control files' from `[PENDING] define a usable character set for description/maintainer name etc'.
> usertag 152955 normative proposal
Bug#152955: debian-policy: section 10.3.2 in force-reload should be more clear
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 152955 force-reload should not start the daemon if it is not running
Bug#152955: debian-policy: section 10.3.2 in force-reload should be more clear
Changed Bug title to `force-reload should not start the daemon if it is not running' from `debian-policy: section 10.3.2 in force-reload should be more clear'.
> usertag 196367 normative proposal
Bug#196367: debian-policy: clarify what to do about priority mismatches
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 196367 Clarify Policy on priority inversion in dependencies
Bug#196367: debian-policy: clarify what to do about priority mismatches
Changed Bug title to `Clarify Policy on priority inversion in dependencies' from `debian-policy: clarify what to do about priority mismatches'.
> usertag 184064 normative proposal
Bug#184064: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Every window manager should provide an alternative to the x-window-manager.1 manpage
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative proposal discussion.
> retitle 184064 Window managers should provide a slave alternative for x-window-manager.1
Bug#184064: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Every window manager should provide an alternative to the x-window-manager.1 manpage
Changed Bug title to `Window managers should provide a slave alternative for x-window-manager.1' from `debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Every window manager should provide an alternative to the x-window-manager.1 manpage '.
> usertag 206684 normative proposal
Bug#206684: debian-policy: Proposal for going ahead with mandatory debconf use for prompting
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 206684 Use of debconf for prompting should be mandatory except for essential packages and pre-dependencies
Bug#206684: debian-policy: Proposal for going ahead with mandatory debconf use for prompting
Changed Bug title to `Use of debconf for prompting should be mandatory except for essential packages and pre-dependencies' from `debian-policy: Proposal for going ahead with mandatory debconf use for prompting'.
> usertag 208010 normative proposal
Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 208010 Require init.d scripts comply with LSB
Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance
Changed Bug title to `Require init.d scripts comply with LSB' from `[PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance'.
> usertag 208011 normative proposal
Bug#208011: [PROPOSAL] UTF-8 encoding for debian/control
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 208011 Mandate UTF-8 for control files
Bug#208011: [PROPOSAL] UTF-8 encoding for debian/control
Changed Bug title to `Mandate UTF-8 for control files' from `[PROPOSAL] UTF-8 encoding for debian/control'.
> usertag 218893 normative proposal
Bug#218893: add Build-Options as a debian/control field
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 218893 Add Build-Options control field
Bug#218893: add Build-Options as a debian/control field
Changed Bug title to `Add Build-Options control field' from `add Build-Options as a debian/control field'.
> usertag 224509 normative proposal
Bug#224509: don't require a tty during maintainer script execution
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative proposal discussion.
> retitle 224509 Don't require a TTY during maintainer script execution
Bug#224509: don't require a tty during maintainer script execution
Changed Bug title to `Don't require a TTY during maintainer script execution' from `don't require a tty during maintainer script execution'.
> usertag 241333 normative proposal
Bug#241333: require debian/changelog be in UTF-8
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 241333 Mandate UTF-8 for changelog files
Bug#241333: require debian/changelog be in UTF-8
Changed Bug title to `Mandate UTF-8 for changelog files' from `require debian/changelog be in UTF-8'.
> usertag 246016 normative proposal
Bug#246016: Define allowed charsets properly
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> merge 99933 246016
Bug#99933: Encourage UTF-8 for documentation and clarify encoding issues
Bug#246016: Define allowed charsets properly
Merged 99933 246016.
> usertag 314808 normative proposal
Bug#314808: [DISCUSS] Incorrect directory for web applications.
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 314808 Web applications should use /usr/share/package, not /usr/share/doc/package
Bug#314808: [DISCUSS] Incorrect directory for web applications.
Changed Bug title to `Web applications should use /usr/share/package, not /usr/share/doc/package' from `[DISCUSS] Incorrect directory for web applications.'.
> usertag 347581 normative proposal
Bug#347581: debian-policy: Explicitly permit *-headers binary package created from library source package
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 347581 Allow library source packages to generate *-headers binary packages
Bug#347581: debian-policy: Explicitly permit *-headers binary package created from library source package
Changed Bug title to `Allow library source packages to generate *-headers binary packages' from `debian-policy: Explicitly permit *-headers binary package created from library source package'.
> usertag 348336 normative proposal
Bug#348336: [PROPOSAL]: improve section on shared config files
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 348336 Clarify Policy around shared configuration files
Bug#348336: [PROPOSAL]: improve section on shared config files
Changed Bug title to `Clarify Policy around shared configuration files' from `[PROPOSAL]: improve section on shared config files'.
> usertag 391836 normative proposal
Bug#391836: debian-policy: New virtual package: cron-daemon
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> usertag 392479 normative proposal
Bug#392479: Request for virtual package ircd
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue proposal.
> usertag 411510 normative proposal
Bug#411510: debian-policy: Document use of /etc/ld.so.conf.d
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative proposal discussion.
> retitle 411510 Use /etc/ld.so.conf.d instead of /etc/ld.so.conf
Bug#411510: debian-policy: Document use of /etc/ld.so.conf.d
Changed Bug title to `Use /etc/ld.so.conf.d instead of /etc/ld.so.conf' from `debian-policy: Document use of /etc/ld.so.conf.d'.
> usertag 416450 normative proposal
Bug#416450: [PROPOSAL] New option in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to avoid running test-suites
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 416450 Add nocheck DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS option to suppress test suites
Bug#416450: [PROPOSAL] New option in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to avoid running test-suites
Changed Bug title to `Add nocheck DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS option to suppress test suites' from `[PROPOSAL] New option in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to avoid running test-suites'.
> usertag 425523 normative proposal
Bug#425523: debian-policy: Should describe error-unwind in case "dpkg-deb -x" fails
Usertags were: normative issue dpkg.
Usertags are now: normative issue proposal dpkg.
> retitle 425523 Describe error unwind when unpacking a package fails
Bug#425523: debian-policy: Should describe error-unwind in case "dpkg-deb -x" fails
Changed Bug title to `Describe error unwind when unpacking a package fails' from `debian-policy: Should describe error-unwind in case "dpkg-deb -x" fails'.
> usertag 436105 normative proposal
Bug#436105: suggestion to add GPL-1 as a common licence
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> retitle 436105 Include GPLv1 in common-licenses
Bug#436105: suggestion to add GPL-1 as a common licence
Changed Bug title to `Include GPLv1 in common-licenses' from `suggestion to add GPL-1 as a common licence'.
> usertag 172436 normative
Bug#172436: [AMENDMENT 12/04/2004] web browser url viewing
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> retitle 172436 BROWSER and sensible-browser standardization
Bug#172436: [AMENDMENT 12/04/2004] web browser url viewing
Changed Bug title to `BROWSER and sensible-browser standardization' from `[AMENDMENT 12/04/2004] web browser url viewing'.
> usertag 367984 normative
Bug#367984: clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> retitle 367984 Clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs
Bug#367984: clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs
Changed Bug title to `Clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs' from `clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs'.
> usertag 442070 normative
Bug#442070: Policy inconsistent with reality: base subsection no longer used
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> usertag 452105 normative
Bug#452105: debian-policy: Homepage field in debian/control undocumented
Usertags were: normative issue.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> usertag 403391 normative
Bug#403391: debian-policy: scripts as configuration files: should vs. must
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> usertag 440420 normative
Bug#440420: [AMENDMENT 11/02/2008] Manual page encoding
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> usertag 430649 normative
Bug#430649: Please clarify splitting/syntax of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Usertags were: normative discussion.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> usertag 291460 normative
Bug#291460: Inclusion of Apache Software License versions in /usr/share/common-licenses
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> usertag 431813 normative
Bug#431813: support for wrapped Uploaders should now be mandatory
Usertags were: normative proposal.
Usertags are now: normative proposal.
> usertag 65577 normative
Bug#65577: [Amended] copyright should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> usertag 209008 normative
Bug#209008: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] common interface for parallel building in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> usertag 250202 normative
Bug#250202: [PROPOSAL] "debian/README.source" file for packages with non-trivial source
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> usertag 379150 normative
Bug#379150: Documentation for Breaks in dpkg
Usertags were: wording normative dpkg.
Usertags are now: wording normative dpkg.
> usertag 392362 normative
Bug#392362: [PROPOSAL] Add should not embed code from other packages
Usertags were: wording normative.
Usertags are now: wording normative.
> usertag 99324 normative
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 99324 wontfix
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 102213 normative
Bug#102213: [PROPOSAL] Policy interpretation and exceptions
Usertags were: informative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative informative dubious discussion.
> tag 102213 wontfix
Bug#102213: [PROPOSAL] Policy interpretation and exceptions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 122817 normative
Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile
Usertags were: normative dubious proposal.
Usertags are now: normative dubious proposal.
> tag 122817 wontfix
Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 169600 normative
Bug#169600: Policy should mandate a place for init.d script to log errors to
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 169600 wontfix
Bug#169600: Policy should mandate a place for init.d script to log errors to
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 203650 normative
Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 203650 wontfix
Bug#203650: Poor recommendation in dpkg-statoverride section
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 253511 normative
Bug#253511: [PROPOSAL] clarify "package must have a name that's unique ..."
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 253511 wontfix
Bug#253511: [PROPOSAL] clarify "package must have a name that's unique ..."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 284340 normative
Bug#284340: base-files: Please remove reference to UC in BSD license and add other licenses
Usertags were: normative dubious proposal.
Usertags are now: normative dubious proposal.
> tag 284340 wontfix
Bug#284340: base-files: Please remove reference to UC in BSD license and add other licenses
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 295006 normative
Bug#295006: debian-policy: Virtual package: change mp3-encoder with music-encoder
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 295006 wontfix
Bug#295006: debian-policy: Virtual package: change mp3-encoder with music-encoder
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 299007 normative
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Usertags were: normative dubious security discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious security discussion.
> tag 299007 wontfix
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Tags were: security
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 331532 normative
Bug#331532: [DISCUSS] change �10.4 "set -e OR check return status" to AND or be rewritten
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 331532 wontfix
Bug#331532: [DISCUSS] change �10.4 "set -e OR check return status" to AND or be rewritten
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 367650 normative
Bug#367650: allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFDL that apply to them
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 367650 wontfix
Bug#367650: allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFDL that apply to them
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 381729 normative
Bug#381729: Artistic Licence considered non-free
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 381729 wontfix
Bug#381729: Artistic Licence considered non-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 434651 normative
Bug#434651: debian-policy: New virtual package: wims-extra
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 434651 wontfix
Bug#434651: debian-policy: New virtual package: wims-extra
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 435476 normative
Bug#435476: base-files: add MIT License as a common license
Usertags were: normative dubious discussion.
Usertags are now: normative dubious discussion.
> tag 435476 wontfix
Bug#435476: base-files: add MIT License as a common license
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 438492 normative
Bug#438492: Policies copyright rule doesn't fit empty transitional packages
Usertags were: normative issue dubious.
Usertags are now: normative issue dubious.
> tag 438492 wontfix
Bug#438492: Policies copyright rule doesn't fit empty transitional packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> usertag 47438 packaging
Bug#47438: [PROPOSAL] update policy copyright
Usertags were: packaging.
Usertags are now: packaging.
> retitle 47438 Update Policy copyright
Bug#47438: [PROPOSAL] update policy copyright
Changed Bug title to `Update Policy copyright' from `[PROPOSAL] update policy copyright'.
> usertag 203098 packaging
Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Usertags were: packaging.
Usertags are now: packaging.
> retitle 203098 Use <link rel="..."> in generated HTML
Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Changed Bug title to `Use <link rel="..."> in generated HTML' from `debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: