[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#294351: marked as done (Please extend 9.4's ellipsis style requirement to cover maintainer scripts and dpkg)



Your message dated Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:15:03 -0600
with message-id <87hdklilzc.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
and subject line Bug#294351: Please extend 9.4's ellipsis style requirement to cover maintainer scripts and dpkg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 11:09:17 +0000
>From jdthood@aglu.demon.nl Wed Feb 09 03:09:17 2005
Return-path: <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cypif-0008UB-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:09:17 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rav.antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76ED232E64;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2005 12:08:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (x123.decis.nl [130.161.177.123])
	by mx2.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E4D232E6A;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2005 12:08:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7218310D627; Wed,  9 Feb 2005 12:08:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Please extend 9.4's ellipsis style requirement to cover maintainer scripts
 and dpkg
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:08:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20050209110823.7218310D627@localhost>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at tudelft.nl
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.1.1
Severity: wishlist

Policy 9.4 requires initscripts to format their output this way:

    Doing something that takes time now...

In #254998 I have asked the dpkg maintainers to replace

    Unpacking replacement foo ...

with

    Unpacking replacement foo...

(etc.) so that when installing packages that run initscripts the ellipsis
style is consistent.

The dpkg maintainer says that he will not proceed with this change until
he is directed to do so by policy.  Also, he would like maintainer
scripts' use of ellipsis to be similarly regulated before he makes the
change to dpkg.  

I therefore ask that policy 9.4 be extended to cover ellipsis in output
from dpkg and from maintainer scripts.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=en_IE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294351-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 19:20:42 +0000
>From srivasta@debian.org Wed Feb 09 11:20:41 2005
Return-path: <srivasta@debian.org>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) [12.107.230.171] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CyxOD-0003Lv-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:20:41 -0800
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (srivasta@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j19JFDC9009818
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:15:13 -0600
Received: (from srivasta@localhost)
	by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j19JF3pa009399;
	Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:15:03 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to srivasta(va, manoj)@debian.org using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>
To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
Cc: 294351-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#294351: Please extend 9.4's ellipsis style requirement to
 cover maintainer scripts and dpkg
Organization: The Debian Project
References: <[🔎] 20050209110823.7218310D627@localhost>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050209:294351@bugs.debian.org::kttNXCj4iObLiby0:00000000000000000000000000000000000000012jU
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050209:jdthood@aglu.demon.nl::fuCh9VwkZMT01Hf4:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000NCOJ
X-Face: #q.#]5@vq!Jz+E0t_/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
 &YlP~HF/=h:GA6o6W@I#deQL-%#.6]!z:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
 78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
 Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050209:294351-done@bugs.debian.org::RuaH0RqdpkUW695x:00000000000000000000000000000000039kqL
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:15:03 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050209110823.7218310D627@localhost> (Thomas Hood's message
 of
	"Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:08:23 +0100")
Message-ID: <87hdklilzc.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -77.9757
X-CRM114-Status: Good  ( pR: -77.9757 )
X-Spam-Value: -18.6754277777778
X-SA-Rep: -18.6754277777778 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.49 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) on 192.168.1.10
Delivered-To: 294351-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:08:23 +0100, Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl> said: 

> (etc.) so that when installing packages that run initscripts the
> ellipsis style is consistent.

	Mere aesthetics are probably not a good enough reason for new
 policy requirements -- this belongs in developers reference, at best.

> The dpkg maintainer says that he will not proceed with this change
> until he is directed to do so by policy.  Also, he would like
> maintainer scripts' use of ellipsis to be similarly regulated before
> he makes the change to dpkg.

	Policy is not a stick to beat maintainers with. Conversly,
 changing policy to make a maintainer do a change that they are not
 willing to do on their own is a bad idea. You need the Tech Ctte,
 really.

	manoj
-- 
Knocked, you weren't in. Opportunity
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: