also sprach martin f krafft <email@example.com> [2005.02.09.2032 +0100]: > Why does the policy mark 30352 UIDs and GIDs as reserved? Manoj explains it: since debian policy applies to debian packages, as far as packages are concerned, they are reserved since policy does not apply to local users, seems like these uids are reserved for local admin seems plausible. Any voices against? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature