|| On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:41:47 -0500
|| Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
br> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:08:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> || On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:07:03 +0100
>> || Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <agi@inittab.org> wrote:
>>
agi> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 02:29:27AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> >> Anthony Towns wrote:
>> >> > "/srv/tftp" would be the right place, wouldn't it?
>> >>
>> >> Sounds fine to me, if we're ready to start using /srv.
>> >>
>>
agi> Seems to be the right place now.
>>
>> And why don't use experimental to do this migration without affect
>> sarge and sid? IMHO is one possibility to start make development of
>> etch while we have sarge like testing.
br> It doesn't sound to me like the change is potentially disruptive enough to
br> warrant keeping such a change out of unstable.
br> Whether it propagates into testing before sarge releases or not is another
br> issue.
The only problem in this case is if some of involved packages need to
have fixes on sarge and on this case t-p-u will need to be used.
IMHO, experimental can be used to have all involved packages updated
and then when it is done move it to unstable. In case of this change
works well on experimental and then on unstable, I don't see any
problem to allow it enters sarge.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpTxS6rcxtDY.pgp
Description: PGP signature