[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#203145: (uploaders in control) Note: not in .deb

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:50:40 -0500, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> said: 

> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:07:12AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Policy does not need to exhaustively document _all_ current
>> practice -- or even all current recommended practices (just look at
>> developers reference)

> Then I do not understand why, for example, you are eager to ensure
> that debian/rules must be a Makefile (to recall an earlier
> discussion).

	I would have thought it was simpe to distinguish between these
 cases.  In once case, policy has provided a rule which packages and
 people can depend upon, and changing it would require much Pan And

	In the other case, there is an attempt being made to add on to
 the set of rules mandated by policy, removing which, as you have
 seen, results in Much Pain And Suffering.

	I am merely trying to minimize the Pain And Suffering.

"It's ten o'clock... Do you know where your AI programs are?"  --
Peter Oakley
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: