Re: Bug#203145: (uploaders in control) Note: not in .deb
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:46:13 +0100, Bill Allombert <email@example.com> said:
> That dpkg behave correctly and that the lack of mention of Uploader:
> in policy is a problem with the policy document not with dpkg.
> Policy is supposed to document current practice, hence dpkg current
Policy does not need to exhaustively document _all_ current
practice -- or even all current recommended practices (just look at
> That's said I have in favour of documenting Uploader:, obviously.
And why is that, exactly?
Porsche: there simply is no substitute. Risky Business
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C