[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10



On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:19:11 -0800, Chris Waters <xtifr@debian.org>
posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy:
 > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:54:55PM +0100, Mark Janssen wrote:
 >> Section 3.10 of the policy document states:
 >> The package installation scripts should avoid producing output which it
 >> is unnecessary for the user to see and ... 
 > I don't believe this is wrong.  I believe that the "it" is allowed
 > because of the infinitive, "to see."
 > As in, "Experience which it was pleasant to gain is my guide."
 > I believe that this is a stylistic, not a grammatical matter.  I would
 > suggest consulting the Chicago Manual of Style or some equivalent
 > work, but I don't have one at hand.  I suspect it may come down to a
 > matter of taste.  I can, if desired, check with professional copy
 > editors of my acquaintance or drop by a library to research the
 > matter.

As any professional editors worth their salt will tell you, if it's
awkward or ambiguous, you should change it.

/* era */

-- 
formail -s procmail <http://www.iki.fi/era/spam/ >http://www.euro.cauce.org/
cat | more | cat<http://www.iki.fi/era/unix/award.html>http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: