Bug#169399: handling of additional documentation with doc-base
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:27:43AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:01:29AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Packages that would deserve a bug are those that which have additional docs
> > > but have registered it only with dhelp or such (ew!) or that have it but
> > > haven't registered it.
> >
> > It would be cool if somebody could figure out how to fix #114692 first.
> > :( Packages with many distinct pieces of additional documentation can't
> > practicably use doc-base otherwise. I don't know if it might require
> > significant design work ...
>
> I think you should just go ahead and implement what you said in the bug
> report, and upload it. I don't think Adam will mind :)
I'm more concerned that it will require changing install-docs' interface
(depending on how it's done, it could even require changing the format
of doc-base control files), and that will be much more difficult if it's
frozen by being documented in policy.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: