Bug#169399: handling of additional documentation with doc-base
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:07:15AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Packages that would deserve a bug are those that which have additional docs
> but have registered it only with dhelp or such (ew!) or that have it but
> haven't registered it.
It would be cool if somebody could figure out how to fix #114692 first.
:( Packages with many distinct pieces of additional documentation can't
practicably use doc-base otherwise. I don't know if it might require
significant design work ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: