On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:56:51AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 07:39:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > b) what severity such bugs should be
> >
> > I strongly disagree with this. I wrote up an extensive explanation of
> > why recently:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2002/debian-ctte-200211/msg00027.html
>
> Hmm, wretched limited debbugs semantics. How about ranges?
> {RC, (serious/important/normal/minor), wishlist} or similar. That still
> covers all the cases, I think.
As you may be able to deduce from the message I cited, I am
uncomfortable with the Policy manual mandating bug severities in any
way.
I think such things are better left to the documentation of the BTS
itself.
--
G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been
branden@debian.org | born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpqlUZCSdxym.pgp
Description: PGP signature