Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs)
i don't know what mailing list manoj is so arrogantly assuming i read,
but i'm clearly not subscribed. did he respond to the other point i made?
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> > > >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> writes:
> > >
> > > Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to read.
> > >
> > > shite? Fix your own darned MUA. (Actually, the breakage maybe
> > > in debbugs, since I see my original message to -policy just fine, but
> > > the message retransmitted from the BTS is garbled)
> >
> > debbugs does not change the email. Try again.
>
> Actually, here is what happens.
>
> Bug gets filed.
> Debbugs saves original email as .report.
> Bug gets closed.
> Debbugs reads .report, and does a textual concatentation of the original
> report, and the -done mail. This appending does not take into account any
> mime settings of the -done mail.
> Mail gets sent to originator.
>
> This is why -done mails look so wrong.
>
>
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
Reply to: