Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
> But if you doi want to run it, this is it,, end of story. So,
> now for when we want to merely test for presence.
Perhaps if you want to test for multiple commands before executing them?
> So what? Who the hell is the postinst to tell me what I should
> or should not be doing with my machine? When I change the command on
Apparently if you have zsh as /bin/sh and try to install xdm, the
postinst will happily tell you what version of debianutils to install to
get readlink.
> my machines, by gar, stupid postsinst should follow suit. Where does
> this overweening sense of the postinst always being right, the human
> who has changed the environment always is wrong coming from? This is
> certainly not the UNIX philosophy.
If you wanted to replace the update-menus command, you would have much
more success by dpkg-diverting it rather than putting your replacement
in /usr/local/bin.
I don't believe anything guarantees that the latter will work, whereas
the former is a good bet.
> Silly, since A is the correct answer, but what the heck do you
> mean it is not standardized? POSIX is a standard, you know, and it
> has indeed standardized this.
It has not. The closest POSIX comes to which is to mention that it came
from csh.
> If we do not need to run the command, this is the
> answer. which is provided by an essential package. which has a well
> known standard behaviour.
Does it? Last I checked the manpage did not accurately reflect the
actual behavior.
>
> If builtin which does not follow POSIX, file a bug.
First you'll need to get it into POSIX.
> Silly, since either A or E would do the trick.
For all Bournish shells in Debian of which I am aware, yes.
> Oh yeah, the Not Invented Here syndrome. POSIX exists, and
> works for everyone else except Debian.
Branden, for example, does not appear to be pleased with the options
POSIX provides him.
> Can we please take this silly thread off policy now?
I imagine that amending policy would help that end.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>