Re: LSB Status
In article <[🔎] 20020106224840.B6444@svpal.svpal.org>,
Grant Bowman <grantbow@svpal.org> wrote:
>* Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> [020106 22:23]:
>> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages, NOT about
>> *.deb or *.rpm packages. Those don't have to be changed.
>
>Really? I guess that could be. On what basis do you make this
>distinction?
Because the LSB standard is about LSB and not about Debian or Redhat.
You could implement LSB on windows (with cygwin) if you wanted.
Mike.
Reply to: