Re: LSB Status

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LSB Status
From: Grant Bowman <grantbow@svpal.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:48:40 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020106224840.B6444@svpal.svpal.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] a1agto$k23$1@ncc1701.cistron.net>
References: <9u32mq$iet$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> <20011203120430.H3534@wiggy.net> <20011203212509.A23069@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20020105071025.A24680@svpal.svpal.org> <[🔎] a1agto$k23$1@ncc1701.cistron.net>

* Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> [020106 22:23]:
> Yes, but the spec is talking about *.lsb packages, NOT about
> *.deb or *.rpm packages. Those don't have to be changed.

Really?  I guess that could be.  On what basis do you make this
distinction?

-- 
-- Grant Bowman                                   <grantbow@svpal.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSB Status
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>

References:
- Re: LSB Status
  - From: Grant Bowman <grantbow@svpal.org>
- Re: LSB Status
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: LSB Status
Next by Date: Re: LSB Status
Previous by thread: Re: LSB Status
Next by thread: Re: LSB Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread