Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:57:26AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > And is the overwhelming majority of interactive scripts that _do_ use
> > > debconf already not a huge enough amount?
> > No, it's not "current practice" to use debconf when a bunch of important
> > packages specifically don't use it.
> Which ones?
wu-ftpd and php4-* were cited earlier, along with lilo. bind was also cited
but is apparently fixed.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
"Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
-- Mike Hoye,
see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
Reply to: