Bug#111281: base-files: MPL should be included in package
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Your Contents file probably didn't include non-US packages.
Exactly this is the reason.
> So, basically, a handful of sources use this... IMHO that's hardly ready for
> inclusion among the current common licenses.
Well, I´m not familiear with policy decisions. However if I´m not
completely wrong the MPL seems to be what I would call a *common license*
if I look at several projects releasing under it. That´s why I expected
that we would have more packages which are released under MPL.
I have no personal feelings about it and if you think this is no reason
to include it in the common licenses dir feel free to close this bug.
PS: By the way: Perhaps we should make clear when a license is "common".
If 2 / 17 / 42 packages share the same license or what else.