Re: obsolete information in debian-policy 3.5.5.0
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > This inconsistency has only been relevant since testing came into
> > being.
>
> Which is months ago now and still nobody noticed, probably since
> the priorities for testing were never documented.
And yet this is the second time that this discussion has come up; I
don't remember which list it was on last time, but I remember the
three of us participating.
I don't particularly care what the resolution is, but it *is* now
documented in a footnote in policy, and people have started to notice
the problem. It would be very easy for you or Anthony to fix, and
would be a nice thing to do.
When you have, please let me know, and I will adjust the policy
footnote accordingly.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: