[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:12:30PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > and there are cross-compilers, whose time-honored standard locations
> > have been completely banned by the FHS.

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:22:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Right. But again: the FHS doesn't say anything useful about
> cross-compilers.


I agree that the banning use of their standard locations is certainly
not useful.

However, it's a major red flag for any treatment of FHS compliance as
a good thing.

Or have I completely missed something?


Reply to: