Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:12:30PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > and there are cross-compilers, whose time-honored standard locations
> > have been completely banned by the FHS.
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:22:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Right. But again: the FHS doesn't say anything useful about
I agree that the banning use of their standard locations is certainly
However, it's a major red flag for any treatment of FHS compliance as
a good thing.
Or have I completely missed something?