Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Chris Waters <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> - A change in the policy to remove the obsolete /usr/doc symlinks.
>This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition.
>Now, if we're really down to 253 packages that use /usr/doc (with no
>symlink), then maybe it's time. But, unfortunately, that number, 253,
>measures *claimed* compliance, not actual compliance.
>Now, my poking around suggests that there are actually far *fewer*
>than 253 packages still using /usr/doc. And if that's true, then it's
>definitely time to remove the symlinks. But it might be nice to have
>some hard facts, rather than speculation based on unreliable claims
>made by inattentive package maintainers.
... which is down to 109 /usr/doc-using packages on i386.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]