Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I second this proposal, subject to the typographical and
> grammatical corrections included below.
> --- policy.sgml.prev Mon Jul 10 11:01:16 2000
> +++ policy.sgml Mon Jul 10 11:41:12 2000
> @@ -2158,6 +2158,27 @@
> + <p>
> + Shared object files (i.e. <file>libsoname.so</file>) that are
Seth Arnold noticed (in a private mail to me) how this stuff in parenthesis
shouldn't be there (my mistake), because the plugins can be named
differently -- the file name makes no practical difference, and e.g. I'd
have to hack nessus-libraries to rename 12 *.nes files.
Since this correction wouldn't change the meaning of the proposal, please
remove that part when you apply the diff to Policy.
> + not public libraries, that is, they are notmeant to be linked
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification