Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses

To: 79538@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 05:55:52 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 200012151355.FAA13222@earth.laney.edu>
Reply-to: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>, 79538@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:58:48 +0100." <[🔎] 20001215135848.B10392@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20001214185906.D5705@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 200012141809.eBEI9X905805@susan.bogus> <[🔎] 20001215135848.B10392@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

Here's a datapoint for ya... this is proof that "everyone wants this license
in the base of debian" isn't true, at least not now.

What is FDL?

Q.E.D.

-Jim

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
  - From: Christian Surchi <csurchi@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
  - From: "Susan G. Kleinmann" <sgk@netbox.kleinmann.com>
- Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

Prev by Date: Re: changing priorities
Next by Date: Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
Previous by thread: Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
Next by thread: Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread