Bug#79538: FDL is missing from common-licenses

[Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> > But is it really a common license? Perhaps dh_make's template manual page
> > should be corrected instead.
> 
> I understand and appreciate the desirability of keeping the base-files 
> package small.  But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes 
> common, and putting it into the common-licenses directory is one step toward 
> making that happen.

I'm not really concerned about base-files' size, compressed legalese is tiny :)
I just think that a license first needs to become common and then be added
to that directory, not the other way around.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification