Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> A more authoritive source disagrees with you.. RMS wrote the GPL
> so I'll trust his opinion above yours.
Ehm, Wichert, you wrote a [PROPOSAL] not a [DO IT NOW] message, so I
think we could discuss about it.
I'm wondering about the meaning of "distribution". *Our* distribution is
the whole distro or a single package? What do we distribute? And if we
distribute a single package too, can we distribute GPL text in the same
place (more or less) and in the same way (mirror or cd for example)? Or
should GPL mean that GPL is *inside* the package?
Am I clear?
Christian Surchi | firstname.lastname@example.org | email@example.com
FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
-----------------> http://www.firenze.linux.it/~csurchi <------------------
If you want to be ruined, marry a rich woman. -- Michelet