Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:40:11 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001129194011.A4005@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.20001129100835.shaleh@valinux.com>; from shaleh@valinux.com on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:08:35AM -0800
References: <[🔎] 20001129184749.A31832@cistron.nl> <[🔎] XFMail.20001129100835.shaleh@valinux.com>

Previously Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I read it, I just don't agree that it matters in this case.

A more authoritive source disagrees with you.. RMS wrote the GPL
so I'll trust his opinion above yours.

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
  - From: Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au>
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
  - From: Christian Surchi <csurchi@debian.org>

References:
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
Next by Date: Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
Previous by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
Next by thread: Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread