[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

/etc/motd references BOTH /usr/doc/*/copyright AND /usr/share/doc/*/copyright

        This is my take on the subject. An  user should not need to
 know about /usr/share/doc; mentioning it, espescially with the
 wording that implies that one needs look into both dirs to be sure,
 is exactly the kind of user interface lossage we were trying to

        /usr/doc symlinks are in place for human backward
 compatibility, but, more importantly, to assure that all docs are
 found under one location, namely, /usr/doc/ for potato, and
 /usr/share/doc in woody.  In either release, we should be able to
 just look into one location for the copyright files. 

        Therefore mentioning /usr/share/doc to users should be
 deprecated in potato; in potato all references should go through
 /usr/doc/<blah>/. When woody is relaesed, we shall tell the end user
 about the new location, but still retain backward compatibility with
 the old location.

         However, whether this is a release critical bug is
 open to debate.

 Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.  Inside of a dog, it
 is too dark to read.
Manoj Srivastava     <srivasta@acm.org>    <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: