[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit

On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously Steve Robbins wrote:
> > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought
> > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant".
> We don't aim to be fully compliant though.

I know the *current* aim is "compatibility".  That's what's written in the
proposed text.

Or are you saying that Debian will *never* aim for "compliance"?
I got the idea that compliance was some sort of far-away goal.
If I'm wrong, the text can be changed to reflect this.


Reply to: