Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Steve Robbins wrote:
> > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought
> > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant".
>
> We don't aim to be fully compliant though.
I know the *current* aim is "compatibility". That's what's written in the
proposed text.
Or are you saying that Debian will *never* aim for "compliance"?
I got the idea that compliance was some sort of far-away goal.
If I'm wrong, the text can be changed to reflect this.
-Steve
Reply to: