[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#60461: debian-policy: FHS conformance not explicit

Previously Steve Robbins wrote:
> Or are you saying that Debian will *never* aim for "compliance"?
> I got the idea that compliance was some sort of far-away goal.
> If I'm wrong, the text can be changed to reflect this.

We aim to be as complient as possible; however there might be a good
reason to not comply with a specific part of the FHS, and I want to
have the freedom to do that.


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpcsKwE2i9Tc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: