Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Joey> - Every package must have exactly one maintainer at a time. This person
> Joey> - is responsible that the license of the package's software complies
> Joey> + Every package must have exactly one maintainer at a time. The
> Joey> + maintainer may be a mailing list. The maintainer is responsible
> Joey> + for ensuring that the license of the package's software complies
> Joey> with the policy of the distribution this package is included in.
>
> Every package must have exactly one valid email
> address. This email address may point to an individual
> maintainer, or it may be a mailing list. In either case
> the entity pointed to (the individual or the mailing
> list) is responsible for ensuring that the license of the
> package's software complies with the policy of the
> distribution this package is included in.
Hm, it sounds better, but perhaps "one valid `maintainer' email address"
would be clearer, since it alludes to the field?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: