Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
- To: Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
- From: Raul Miller <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:29:49 -0500
- Message-id: <19991201172949.A8366@usatoday.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:34:45PM -0600
- References: <19991129003946.B23998@mors.net> <19991128221429.B8072@debian.org> <19991129105454.B14162@usatoday.com> <19991130081730.A10227@debian.org> <19991130133425.O16162@kitenet.net> <19991130180756.C14799@usatoday.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:34:45PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> That happens to be your interpretation of the social contract.
> I see the packages in main to be absolutely free (fulfilling the
> social contract about 100% free distribution) while retaining
> the freedom to talk about other packages that are not fee (again
> fulfilling the social contract, as in supporting our users use of
> non-free stuff, amongst other things.
This isn't about "talking about other packages".