Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:34:45PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> That happens to be your interpretation of the social contract.
> I see the packages in main to be absolutely free (fulfilling the
> social contract about 100% free distribution) while retaining
> the freedom to talk about other packages that are not fee (again
> fulfilling the social contract, as in supporting our users use of
> non-free stuff, amongst other things.
This isn't about "talking about other packages".