Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
At 17:20 -0600 1999-11-30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Raul> And we still don't have a good example case where "free package
>suggests
> Raul> non-free package" is better than "non-free package enhances free
>package"
>
> Latex2html suggesting non-fee bits which can create gifs. ZIf
> it can create a gif, it can't be free. And a gif creator does not
> exist to ``enhance'' the multitudes of packages that can use it;
> those packages should reasonably suggest a package that provides
> added functionality.
Do not use gif as an example, that's a whole 'nother argument.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: