Re: Source dependencies: are we ready?
(Sorry, bad manners to followup own email, but more came to me..)
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 03:50:06AM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 03:41:00AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> [...]
> > I've eliminated the tetex-bin dependency, BTW. bzip2 hadn't occurred
> > to me as a dependency, but I guess it is. What else? patch? We need
> > to discuss what's build-essential anyway. Here's a start:
> >
> > libc-dev
> > gcc
> > g++
> > libstdc++-dev
> > patch
> > make
> > dpkg-dev
> > binutils
> > bison
> autoconf ?
> bin86 ?
> ldso ?
>
> supporting stuff....
> tar ?
> cpio ?
> gzip ?
> bzip2 ?
> find ?
> perl ?
.awk ?
sed ?
> less likely, but still possible...
> curses ?
> groff/man ?
>
> specialized...
> perl ?
> wish ?
> python ?
> jdk ?
>
> (some of the items under 'supporting stuff' I found in the linux kernel
> Makefile.. :)
--
Seth Arnold | http://www.willamette.edu/~sarnold/
Hate spam? See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/ for help
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into
your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Reply to: