Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > I'm about to add #41232 (source dependencies) to the next policy > version. But will this break existing tools? Yes. And I won't think I want to change dpkg and friends to accept the fields until someone comes up with a complete implementation. I'm annoyed though, that everyone is completely ignoring a *working* implementation of source-dependencies simply because nobody is willing to clean it up a little and package it. How can that happen??? Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpN_qvCmGeox.pgp
Description: PGP signature