Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
> Ok, let's bring this back to implementation. How would you propose we handle
> this? Currently daemons install, set themselves up, and begin running.
>
> a) we can prompt.
> b) we leave everything off and let the admin turn it on (not an option for
> obvious reasons)
> c) first come first serve -- first daemon installed does its job, the rest
> install unconfigured
>
> any others?
d) have something that keeps track of installed services, perhaps with
priorities akin to alternatives. If there weren't an issue of
services being run either in inetd or standalone, this could
be accomplished with a souped-up update-inetd.
Reply to: