Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Ok, let's bring this back to implementation. How would you propose we handle
> > this? Currently daemons install, set themselves up, and begin running.
> > a) we can prompt.
> > b) we leave everything off and let the admin turn it on (not an option for
> > obvious reasons)
> > c) first come first serve -- first daemon installed does its job, the rest
> > install unconfigured
> > any others?
> d) have something that keeps track of installed services, perhaps with
> priorities akin to alternatives. If there weren't an issue of
> services being run either in inetd or standalone, this could
> be accomplished with a souped-up update-inetd.
I'll stick my hand up for option (c). The effort involved in
modifiying configurations is marginal.