Re: consensus on debug (-g) policy
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 03:17:48PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 08:10:05PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Since this obviously has a consensus, I am making it amended. Here are the
> > final changes.
>
> Actually, on Sept 1, Chris Waters raised an objection about
> the use of the =debug abstraction.
>
> [And, personally, I think he has a point: inventing a new mini-language
> to specify CFLAGS=-g doesn't seem to solve any useful problem. But the
> real issue is that I don't see that you have a consensus yet.]
I received around 5 seconds to this proposal and several agreements on it's
usefulness. 1 objection doesn't kill all this agreement does it?
Ben
Reply to: