Re: Loc'n of constitution (was Re: Policy about policy)
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Chris> It's in the developers-reference package. Policy might be a better
Chris> place, but it *is* packaged.
But is policy a better place? The constitution belongs with
documents like the social contract, and the DFSG (the three form a
defininset of documents for the project). None of the documents is
under the purview of the policy group, though all these documents
have varying impact on the policy of the project.
I have not yet seen arguments compelling enough to go out and
move these documents into a different package -- it is just not worht
And if we do decide to move it, I propose we create a new
package which contains the social contract, the DFSG, and the
constitution, along with any other documents that are essentially
Technical policy seems like a bad repository.
Removing the straw that broke the camel's back does not necessarily
allow the camel to walk again.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E