Re: [PROPOSAL] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way
> I was thinking more along the lines of "you should use -g in the
> default build, unless you provide a build that honors
> BUILD_DEBUG=y".
>
> This keeps us from forcing current packages to move to this, in the
> even that it may be downright insane to modify the build in this
> way.
Hmm... I think I got the words wrong... :-(
My intention is to say "either default -g or BUILD_DEBUG, but if time
allows, then please move to BUILD_DEBUG". However, I don't want to
consider it a bug if a package still uses -g by default.
How to express that best?
Roman
Reply to: