>From the constitution: |8. The Project Leader's Delegates | |8.1. Powers | |The Project Leader's Delegates: | | 1.have powers delegated to them by the Project Leader; | 2.may make certain decisions which the Leader may not make directly, |including approving or expelling Developers or designating people as |Developers who do not maintain packages. This is to avoid concentration |of power, particularly over membership as a Developer, in the hands |of the Project Leader. There's the method for removing someone.. basicly for any reason (it's a little too much power if there was no peer pressure) even not liking someones haircut. It's a matter of having a team appointed by the leader (iwj appointed the new maintianer team). The only non-guarentee here: it's not *necessary* for the team to follow the consesus of the list... On 28-Jan-99 John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:13:43AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote: > >> > 2. Having that, there should be policy allowing the dismissal of people >> > that >> > gratitiously violate policy. >> >> It's implicit. Do we need to make it explicit? What is "gratitiously"? >> Who'll make the accusation? Where will the burden of proof be? (ie. was it >> gratitious? not was it a violation). This is another thing I think can be >> handled via peer-pressure. If you(general) think someone is "gratitiously >> violating policy" bring it up on one of the lists and let the whole project >> decide and decide action on a case by case basis. > > I agree that sounds fine, but there is nothing anywhere that I've seen that > gives the Project that capability. > >> >> -- >> Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. >> ========================================================================= >> * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * >> * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* >> * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * >> * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* >> * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * >> * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * >> * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * >> * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* >> ========================================================================= > > > > -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgp0qMQUgQtbI.pgp
Description: PGP signature