Re: Mechanism for removing developers
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:13:43AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> > 2. Having that, there should be policy allowing the dismissal of people that
> > gratitiously violate policy.
>
> It's implicit. Do we need to make it explicit? What is "gratitiously"?
> Who'll make the accusation? Where will the burden of proof be? (ie. was it
> gratitious? not was it a violation). This is another thing I think can be
> handled via peer-pressure. If you(general) think someone is "gratitiously
> violating policy" bring it up on one of the lists and let the whole project
> decide and decide action on a case by case basis.
I agree that sounds fine, but there is nothing anywhere that I've seen that
gives the Project that capability.
>
> --
> Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
> =========================================================================
> * http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
> * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
> * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
> * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
> * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
> * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ *
> * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ *
> * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
> =========================================================================
Reply to: